The European Union on Thursday pledged 61 million euros (90.22
million dollars) in aid to the Philippines, the economic planning
department said.
Some 36 million euros will be used to deliver basic social
services with a priority on health, the authority said in a
statement.
A further 12 million euros will be used to support efforts
to bring peace to Mindanao island, which has been plagued by
a decades-old Muslim separatist rebellion, with the remainder
earmarked for trade development.
The European Union has poured about one billion euros in aid
into the Philippines since 1976, the Manila government agency
said.
Since 2001, the Arroyo government has received
some $310 million in military aid making it the largest recipient
of U.S. military assistance in Southeast Asia. Africa, Sonny, “U.S.
imperialism in Southeast Asia and ASEAN,” Dec. 2006.
[101] The
Philippine Aidwatch Network warned that increased U.S. military
aid and development assistance focusing in conflict areas
may covertly be used by the AFP to intensify its attack not
only against the NPA guerillas but against unarmed civilians
especially leaders and members of legal organizations. (“U.S.
aid militarization and Arroyo’s policy of repression,” Ibon
Features in A New Wave of State Terror in the Philippines,
2005. Quezon City, Philippines: Ibon Foundation, Inc.
[102] Weapons
have also been flowing in. The U.S. delivered $67.6 million
in military equipment to the Philippines between 2001-2003.
Between 2001 and 2005, the Philippines also received $145.8
million in Foreign Military Financing and another $11.5 million
in military training aid, for a total of more than $157.3
million. In 2005, the Arroyo government was slated to receive
$20 million in FMF and another $2.9 million in IMET for 2006.
(Source: Arms Trade Resource Center / World Policy Institute)
______________________________
The Arroyo government’s intensified attacks on the
people, marked by the cold-blooded murder of unarmed political
activists, church people, journalists, lawyers and judges,
teachers and human rights defenders continue to multiply with
impunity. These are motivated by Arroyo’s drive
for political survival and are in line with the US government’s “war
on terror” and the economic interest of multinational
corporations in the Philippines. This explains why the Arroyo
government has not lifted a finger to render justice to the
victims of human rights violations, and to address the violations
of the people’s social, economic, cultural rights, as
well as the violations of the Filipino people’s sovereignty
and right to self-determination. Taking a cue from the
US-led global war on terror and emboldened and encouraged by
the US government, the Arroyo government estimates it can also
justify, gloss over or cover up, in the name of counter-terrorism, violations
of human rights, international humanitarian law, and
international law.
Well-documented cases of human rights violations have already
been brought to the attention of the United Nations through
its offices in New York and Geneva. A number of international
entities have also conducted fact-finding missions and have
issued reports, recommendations and condemnations of the regime’s
lack of resolute action to stop the killings. Among these
international groups are the Amnesty International, International
Parliamentarians’ Union, Asian Human Rights Commission,
the International Labor Solidarity Mission, the International
Peasants Fact Finding Mission, the Hong Kong Fact-Finding Mission
to the Philippines, Reporters Sans Frontiers, a delegation
of church leaders led by the World Council of Churches and
the Christian Conference of Asia, Lawyers without Borders and
Lawyers for Lawyers from the Netherlands, International Association
of Democratic Lawyers, International Association of People’s
Lawyers, and four women lawyers from the United States.
Various
church organizations like the World Council of Churches, Christian
Conference of Asia, World Alliance of Reformed Churches, World
Methodist Council, Episcopal Church of the USA, Uniting Church
of Australia, United Church of Canada, United Methodist
Church of the USA, United Evangelical Mission of Germany and
the National Council of Churches in Japan have likewise issued
their statements and resolutions calling on the Manila government
to bring an end to the killings. Notably, a number of
Members of Parliament from Europe and a number of officials
from other countries have also expressed their concerns over
the deteriorating human rights situation in the Philippines.
The list continues to lengthen.
In
response to this growing international pressure, Macapagal-Arroyo
belatedly saw the need to take a pro-forma official action
by creating the Melo Commission in September 2006 to look into
the killings. This step was clearly intended to deflect
and diffuse the barrage of criticisms against her government.
But before this Commission could start its investigation, Mrs.
Arroyo issued a blanket statement absolving her military and
police forces of any wrongdoing, despite testimonies from survivors
and witnesses to the contrary. As expected, the
Melo Commission, in the report it had recently submitted
to President Arroyo, cleared her and the AFP top brass of any
responsibility, instead blaming the killings on Gen. Palparan
and a “small group” of rogue military and police
elements, as well as gangsters and even the New People’s
Army. Curiously, Malacanang (The Philippine Islands'
"White House" equivalent) adamantly refused to release the
Melo Commission report to the public until it had to give in
to both international and local pressure to do so.
Nearly
simultaneous with the submission and eventual release of the
Melo Commission report was the statement of Philip Alston,
the UN Special Rapporteur on Extra-judicial killings, on his
findings after a 10-day visit. Mr. Alston met with the
representatives of the government, including top Cabinet, military
and police officials, human rights groups and relatives of
victims of extra-judicial killings. In his press statement,
Mr. Alston rejected the various government, military and police “theories” that
absolved them from any responsibility in the killings. While
he said it was clear to him that the killings are not state
policy and are not centrally directed, Alston nonetheless attributed some
of the killings to the government’s counter-insurgency
program and indicated he would examine this in greater detail
in his final report. Despite the findings of Mr. Alston and
the Melo Commission attributing political killings to the AFP,
Arroyo reiterated her earlier statement absolving the military
of the crimes and declaring that “99.9% of the AFP
is good”.
The
struggle to uphold and defend human rights and the peoples’ rights
continues. The Filipino people have shown that they cannot
be cowed by terror nor duped by the Arroyo regime. They persist
in seeking and finding avenues to make this despicable situation
known throughout the world, to seek justice, and gather the
broadest support for their just and legitimate struggle for
national self-determination and social emancipation.
As long as the current prez
supports the U. S. government the dollars will flow in and
nothing will be done by the Senate and Congress in america
to stop the police who are preying upon the tourists and any
white man in their country (The beautiful Philippine Islands).
We do not agree with everything
any source has to say. you can use a discerning eye to read
more here,
http://www.philippinetribunal.org/dmdocuments/verdict_ppt2_philippines.pdf
_______________________
The War On Terror In The Philippine
Islands
The ASG was founded by remnants
of the Islamist mujahadeen, bankrolled and manipulated by the
CIA, the Pakistani ISI, and elements of Saudi Arabia’s
wealthy elite during the jihad against the Soviet Union in
the 1980s. Philippine Sen. Aquilino Pimentel, Jr. called Abu
Sayyaf a “CIA monster.”[144] According
to John Cooley, author of Unholy Wars, the Abu Sayyaf was the
last of the seven Afghan guerrilla groups to be organized late
in the war in Afghanistan in 1986 or three years before the
Soviets withdrew.
The fact is that
since the early 1990s, the group which by then had gone back to Mindanao, has
been involved chiefly in criminal operations while maintaining liaisons with
both military and local officials. This is partly the reason why the group refuses
to die. Just as the U.S. has inflated the al-Qaeda legend, the U.S. and Philippine
officials are playing up the Abu Sayyaf "monster" and its alleged connection
to al-Qaeda to justify a bigger U.S. military assistance program and bigger U.S.
operations in the Asia Pacific region.
As a kidnap-for-ransom group,
the Abu Sayyaf has been covertly supported by some Philippine
military and police officers since the 1990s. Senator Pimentel
said that during the Ramos administration (1992-1998), these
officers did not only “handle” but also coddled,
trained, protected them, passed on military equipment and funds
from the CIA and its support network.[146]
_______________